University–Government Partnerships in Social Work Education: Development, Benefits, and Challenges of the Title IV-E Training Program in Puerto Rico

Introduction:

Puerto Rico became a U.S. territory under the Treaty of Paris of 1898. The Jones–Shafroth Act of 1917 granted U.S. citizenship to individuals born on the island without extending full political participation, thereby preserving Puerto Rico's colonial institutional framework (U.S. Department of State, n.d.; Library of Congress, n.d.). The island's political and economic relationship with the United States has also been shaped by the Jones Act (Merchant Marine Act of 1920), whose cabotage provisions have increased shipping costs and the price of essential goods (U.S. Customs and Border Protection, n.d.; Government Accountability Office, 2013). Although Puerto Rico receives federal funding and has its own government, its social welfare programs are not funded at levels comparable to those of the states, and access to many federal programs remains limited.

Against this backdrop, the United States developed Title IV-E university–government partnerships during the 1980s to prepare social workers for the public child welfare workforce. Authorized under the Social Security Act of 1935, Section 474(a)(3)(B) of Title IV-E (42 U.S.C. § 674(a)(3)(B)) provides federal reimbursement to states and territories for training employees of public and private child welfare agencies and social work students preparing to enter the profession. Social work students constitute the core of the University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras Campus, Title IV-E Training Program.

Although Puerto Ricans contribute to the Social Security system, Puerto Rico remained ineligible for these training funds for decades. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 finally extended Title IV-E funding to Puerto Rico.

After more than four decades of exclusion, this article examines the partnership between the Government of Puerto Rico and the University of Puerto Rico to implement the Title IV-E program, compares the U.S. and Puerto Rican experiences, reviews the available evidence on program outcomes, and offers recommendations for strengthening this initiative.

Origins and Development of University–Government Partnerships for the Preparation of Social Workers in the Child Welfare System:

United States: Title IV-E scholarship programs represent one of the most significant initiatives for professionalizing the U.S. public child welfare system. Developed through partnerships between universities and public child welfare agencies, these programs were designed to strengthen workforce preparation and increase the number of qualified social workers in public child welfare.

These partnerships expanded during the 1980s and 1990s following the enactment of the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act (1980), which increased investment in specialized social work education to address the complex needs of children, youth, and families (Hartinger-Saunders & Lyons, 2013; Mathias et al., 2015). The literature indicates that Title IV-E programs evolved into university–government partnerships that strengthened the workforce through shared governance, continuous evaluation, and periodic renewal of interagency agreements (Hartinger-Saunders & Lyons, 2013; Mathias et al., 2015).

A leading example is the California Social Work Education Center (CalSWEC), established at the University of California, Berkeley. Its statewide partnership integrated universities, public child welfare agencies, and governmental organizations while developing competency standards, evaluation systems, and transparent funding mechanisms that were later replicated elsewhere (Mathias et al., 2015; University of California Davis Human Services, 2021).

Comparable initiatives in Nevada and Georgia confirmed the value of collaborative curriculum planning, academic supervision, and shared institutional responsibility in improving workforce preparation and child welfare services (Reilly & Petersen, 1997; Ellett et al., 2003). Collectively, these partnerships established educational models grounded in accountability, social responsibility, and workforce development that strengthened the public child welfare system (Scannapieco, Hegar, & Connell, 2012; Zlotnik & Pryce, 2013).

Puerto Rico: The University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras Campus (UPRRP) Title IV-E Social Work Training Program (PROCATS IV-E) was established in 2023 through a partnership between the University of Puerto Rico and the Administration for Families and Children (ADFAN) of the Puerto Rico Department of the Family (DF). Building on a longstanding institutional collaboration, the partnership was created to strengthen social work education for the child welfare system by integrating higher education, public policy, and professional practice while increasing the number of qualified social workers employed by ADFAN (Negrón Velázquez, 2024).

PROCATS IV-E originated from a June 22, 2022 meeting involving representatives of the University of Puerto Rico, the Puerto Rico, Department of the Family, and the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), during which participants agreed on adapting the U.S. Title IV-E model to Puerto Rico's needs (Negrón Velázquez, June 2022). Drawing on programs such as CalSWEC, PROCATS IV-E became responsible for financial management, professional training, program evaluation, and accountability. Academic programs were responsible for providing professional education in social work, at the undergraduate and graduate level.

PROCATS IV-E was launched at a time of significant student financial need (Ortiz-Ortiz et al., 2024). Since its inception, the program has provided tuition assistance, monthly stipends, specialized training, and continuous assessment of students’ learning. Program evaluation is guided by the Donabedian Model (1981, 1988), traditionally used in healthcare quality assessment but adapted here to social work education (Negrón Velázquez, 2013). This innovative application evaluates PROCATS IV-E through student characteristics and the program's structure, process, and outcome components.

Benefits:

Evidence consistently shows that Title IV-E university–government partnerships have strengthened the professionalization of the public child welfare workforce. These programs combine scholarships, supervised field education, and specialized training to improve workforce retention, competency development, and organizational stability (Hopkins et al., 1999; Ellett, 2014). Longitudinal studies report that graduates experience greater job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and longer tenure than non-Title IV-E employees in public child welfare agencies (Jones, 2003; Zlotnik et al., 2005).

Reports from the California Social Work Education Center (CalSWEC) document substantial increases in the proportion of master's-level social workers employed in public child welfare agencies, together with sustainable evaluation systems and professional development initiatives (CalSWEC, 2011, 2013; UC Davis Human Services, 2021). Retention rates of approximately 82% among graduates who fulfill their service commitment further demonstrate the model's effectiveness in strengthening the workforce (Clark, 2003; Leung & Willis, 2012).

The literature also indicates that competency-based education improves the alignment between academic preparation and professional practice, reduces turnover, and strengthens ethical decision-making, complex case management, and family crisis intervention (Austin et al., 1999; Scannapieco & Connell-Corrick, 2003; Leung & Willis, 2012; Hartinger-Saunders & Lyons, 2013). These programs have also diversified the workforce, increased the representation of historically underrepresented groups, and strengthened the ethical identity of public child welfare social workers through educational models centered on professional values and informed decision-making (Pomeroy & Holleran, 2016; Jones & Okamura, 2015; Mathias et al., 2015; Newell & Bounds, 2021). Nevertheless, additional longitudinal research and integrated administrative data systems are still needed to better link professional education with outcomes for children and families served by the child welfare system (Mathias et al., 2015).

Although still in its early stages, the UPRRP PROCATS IV-E program has begun to demonstrate several of these documented benefits. Since its inception, the program has provided financial support and child welfare related training to 74 social work students, covering topics such as child safety, permanency, well-being, children's rights, trauma-informed practice, family intervention, and the legal, psychosocial, and community dimensions of child welfare, all grounded in social justice and professional ethics (Negrón Velázquez, 2024). A remaining challenge is to expand recruitment to ADFAN employees seeking formal social work education.

Preliminary findings support the value of this university–government partnership. The graduation of the first scholarship recipient in December 2024 demonstrated the program's feasibility (University of Puerto Rico, February 2025). Early results also show a 97% first-year retention rate, consistent recruitment of new cohorts, and positive student evaluations, findings that mirror the evidence reported for comparable Title IV-E initiatives (University of Puerto Rico, June 2025). These results underscore PROCATS IV-E's potential to strengthen social work education and Puerto Rico's child welfare workforce.

Like other Title IV-E programs, PROCATS IV-E seeks to facilitate graduates' transition into ADFAN, to become part of the public child welfare workforce. This new workforce is expected to support the implementation of the principles established under Law 57 of 2023 on child maltreatment prevention, family preservation, and deinstitutionalization (Ley para Prevención del Maltrato, Preservación de la Unidad Familiar y para la Seguridad, Bienestar y Protección de los Menores – Ley Núm. 57 de 11 de mayo de 2023 – vLex Puerto Rico).

While the U.S. literature documents outcomes after more than four decades of implementation, PROCATS IV-E remains an emerging initiative whose Donabedian Model (1981, 1988) evaluation is ongoing. Evidence on student characteristics and structural, process, and outcome variables will determine the extent to which the Puerto Rican experience reproduces these documented benefits while strengthening this university–government partnership model.

Challenges and Conclusions:

The literature on Title IV-E programs consistently demonstrates that the primary challenge facing university–government partnerships is not merely in their implementation but in rigorously demonstrating their impact on professional practice and outcomes for children and families. Existing research identifies several persistent limitations, including fragmented impact assessment, the absence of comparative baseline measures, limited longitudinal tracking of graduates, and insufficient integration of academic and administrative data systems (Collins, 2008; Barth & Gilbert, 2014; Jones & Okamura, 2015; Barth, 2022). In response, scholars have proposed multilevel evaluation frameworks that integrate individual, institutional, and societal indicators, thereby linking professional education to measurable outcomes within child welfare systems (Hartinger-Saunders & Lyons, 2013; Mathias et al., 2015).

The literature further emphasizes that the long-term sustainability of these partnerships depends on strong governance structures. Successful programs have established formal agreements, shared decision-making mechanisms, and transparent accountability and conflict-resolution procedures that strengthen collaboration between universities and public agencies (Child Welfare Information Gateway, 2022a, 2022b). Likewise, the quality of field education can be enhanced through structured learning agreements, specialized supervision, and integrative university–agency seminars (Field Educator, 2021; Newell & Bounds, 2021), while transition-to-work strategies—including mentoring, induction academies, and ongoing support during the first years of employment—have proven effective in improving workforce retention (Leung & Willis, 2012; National Child Welfare Workforce Institute, 2020).

Additional challenges include compliance with Title IV-E administrative and financial requirements, monitoring graduates' post-service obligations, ensuring long-term financial sustainability, and incorporating culturally responsive and equity-oriented approaches into professional education. The literature recommends strengthening internal auditing systems, graduate tracking mechanisms, long-term financial planning, and the integration of social justice principles throughout the educational curriculum (Administration for Children and Families, 2015, 2023; Pomeroy & Holleran, 2016; Legislative Analyst’s Office of California, 2019; California State University, Stanislaus, 2020; Child Welfare Information Gateway, 2022).

These challenges become even more complex in contexts characterized by high staff turnover, excessive caseloads, limited clinical supervision, insufficient training, institutional fragility, administrative politicization, and policy discontinuity (Scannapieco & Connell-Corrick, 2003; Ellett, 2014). Within this context, the long-term success of PROCATS IV-E will depend on the ability of both partner institutions to preserve shared governance, strengthen evaluation systems, and ensure the continuity of the program beyond changes in political administrations (Jones & Okamura, 2015; Mathias et al., 2015).

Beyond its promising initial outcomes, PROCATS IV-E raises a broader question with implications that extend beyond social work education: Can a university–government partnership preserves its academic autonomy, ethical integrity, and commitment to social justice within a context marked by structural inequality, frequent political change, and political and discriminatory pressures? The answer will depend less on the availability of financial resources than on the capacity of both institutions to sustain a shared vision centered on the well-being of children and families. In this sense, PROCATS IV-E transcends its role as a scholarship program and becomes a valuable case for examining the potential of public–academic partnerships as instruments of social transformation. As the program continues to evolve, it will generate knowledge that is relevant not only for Puerto Rico but also for other jurisdictions seeking to strengthen their child welfare systems through collaborative models of professional social work education.

References:

Administration for Children and Families (ACF). (2023). Child Welfare Policy Manual. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://cwpm.acf.gov

Administration for Children and Families [ACF]. (2015). *Title IV-E Foster Care On-Site Review Instrument and Instructions* (Spanish edition). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act, Pub. L. No. 96-272 (1980). H.R.3434 - 96th Congress (1979-1980): Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

Austin, M. J., Martin, M., Carnochan, S., Goldberg, S., Berrick, J. D., Weiss, B., & Kelley, J. (1999). Building a comprehensive agency–university partnership: A case study of the Bay Area social services consortium. Journal of Community Practice, 6(3), 89–106.

Barth, R. P. (2022). Research to consider while effectively redesigning child welfare services: A response to commentaries. Research on Social Work Practice, 32(4), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315221089060

Barth, R. P., & Gilbert, N. (2014). Child welfare and the child protection system: An international perspective. Oxford University Press.

California State University, Stanislaus. (2020). Title IV-E Stipend Program Handbook. https://www.csustan.edu

California Social Work Education Center (CalSWEC). (2011). Title IV-E Stipend Program Final Report, July 1 2012–June 30 2013. California Social Work Education Center.

CalSWEC. (2013). Title IV-E Stipend Program releases annual report. University of California, Berkeley.

Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2022). University–agency partnerships for child welfare workforce development. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.childwelfare.gov

Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2022). Funding strategies for child welfare training partnerships. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.childwelfare.gov

Clark, S. J. (2003). The California collaboration: A competency-based child welfare curriculum project for master’s social workers. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 7(1–2), 135–157.* https://doi.org/10.1300/J137v07n01_09

Collins, M. E. (2008). An evaluation of Title IV-E education for public child welfare practice. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 2(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548730802118337

Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Pub. L. No. 117–328, 136 Stat. 4459 (2022). https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ328/PLAW-117publ328.pdf

DigitalCommons @ University of Nebraska. (2021). Title IV-E program outcomes study. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu

Donabedian, A. (1981). Criteria, norms and standards of quality: What do they mean? American Journal of Public Health, 71, 409-412.

Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care. How can it be assessed? Journal of the Amercian Medical Association, 260(12), 1743-1748.

Ellett, A. J. (2014). A first-hand account of Title IV-E child welfare initiatives in social work education. Advances in Social Work, 15(1), 63–79.* https://doi.org/10.18060/16681

Ellett, A. J., Ellett, C. D., & Rugutt, J. K. (2003). A study of personal and organizational factors contributing to employee retention and turnover in child welfare in Georgia. University of Georgia.

Field Educator. (2021). Special issue: Ethics and child welfare practice. Simmons University School of Social Work. https://fieldeducator.simmons.edu

Government Accountability Office. (2013). Puerto Rico: Characteristics of the island’s maritime trade and potential effects of modifying the Jones Act (GAO-13-260). https://www.gao.gov

Hartinger-Saunders, R., & Lyons, P. (2013). Social work education and public child welfare: A review of the peer-reviewed literature on Title IV-E funded programs. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 7(3), 275–297.* https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2013.801087

Hopkins, K. M., Mudrick, N. R., & Rudolph, C. S. (1999). Impact of university/agency partnerships in child welfare on organizations, workers, and work activities. Child Welfare, 78(6), 749–773.

Jones, L. P. (2003). A follow-up of a Title IV-E program’s graduates’ retention rates in a public child welfare agency. Journal of Health & Social Policy, 15(3–4), 39–51.* https://doi.org/10.1300/J045v15n03_03

Jones, L. P., & Okamura, A. (2015). Revisiting the impact of Title IV-E programs on child welfare practice. Children and Youth Services Review, 48, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.12.012

Legislative Analyst’s Office of California. (2019). Improving workforce diversity in child welfare. https://lao.ca.gov

Leung, P., & Willis, N. G. (2012). The impact of Title IV-E training on case outcomes for children serviced by CPS. Journal of Family Strengths, 12(1), Article 9.

Ley para Prevención del Maltrato, Preservación de la Unidad Familiar y para la Seguridad, Bienestar y Protección de los Menores (Ley Núm. 57 de 11 de mayo de 2023). Ley para Prevención del Maltrato, Preservación de la Unidad Familiar y para la Seguridad, Bienestar y Protección de los Menores (Ley Núm. 57 de 11 de mayo de 2023) - vLex Puerto Rico

Library of Congress. (s. f.). Jones Act (1917). https://www.loc.gov

Mathias, C., Gilman, E., Shin, C., & Evans, W. T. (2015). California’s Title IV-E Partnership: A Statewide University–Agency Collaboration—Characteristics and Implications for Replication. Journal of Social Work Education, 51(Suppl. 2), S252–S270. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2015.1073082

Metropolitan State University of Denver School of Social Work. (2021). Distance MSW and Title IV-E training model. https://msudenver.edu

National Association of Social Workers. (2017). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. NASW Press. https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English

National Child Welfare Workforce Institute (NCWWI). (2020). University Partnerships: Building the child welfare workforce. University at Albany, SUNY. https://ncwwi.org

Negrón Velázquez, G. (2024, 1 de enero). Departamento de Trabajo Social de la UPR: incubadora de recursos comprometidos con Puerto Rico. Punto de Vista, El Nuevo Día, HTTPS://WWW.ELNUEVODIA.COM/OPINION/PUNTO-DE-VISTA/DEPARTAMENTO-DE-TRABAJO-SOCIAL-DE-LA-UPR-INCUBADORA-DE-RECURSOS-COMPROMETIDOS-CON-PUERTO-RICO/

Negrón Velázquez, G. (2022, 22 de junio). Presentation to the President of the University of Puerto Rico and the Administration for Children and Families (ACF). San Juan, PR: Office of the President, University of Puerto Rico.

Negrón Velázquez, G. (2022, 5 de abril). Conferencia 50 Aniversario Departamento de Trabajo Social UPRRP. Grabación 50 Aniversario Departamento Trabajo Social

Negrón Velázquez, G. (2013). Calidad de vida de personas con VIH/SIDA en San Juan, Puerto Rico: Su signficado y cómo medirla. Hato Rey, PR: Publicaciones Puertorriqueñas, Inc.

Newell, J. M., & Bounds, C. W. (2021). University–Agency Partnerships: A Title IV-E Training Initiative on Ethics and Child Welfare Practice. Field Educator, 10(2). https://fieldeducator.simmons.edu

Ortiz-Ortiz, Y., Pérez-Jiménez, D. y Rosa- Rodríguez, Y. (2024). Estudio de necesidades estudiantiles de la UPRRP. SA-UPRRP-Estudio-de-Necesidades-Estudiantiles-Sept-2024.pdf

Pomeroy, E., & Holleran, L. (2016). University–agency partnerships and workforce development: Lessons from Title IV-E programs. Journal of Social Work Education, 52(2), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1151275

Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act, Pub. L. No. 114–187, 130 Stat. 549 (2016). https://www.congress.gov/114/plaws/publ187/PLAW-114publ187.pdf

Reilly, T., & Petersen, N. (1997). Nevada’s university–state partnership: A comprehensive alliance for improved services to children and families. Public Welfare, 55(2), 21–28.

Scannapieco, M., & Connell-Corrick, K. (2003). Do collaborations with schools of social work make a difference for the field of child welfare? Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 7(1–2), 35–51.* https://doi.org/10.1300/J137v07n01_03

Scannapieco, M., Hegar, R., & Connell, B. (2012). Title IV-E and social work education: A partnership for child welfare excellence. Child Welfare, 91(3), 9–36.

Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 301 et seq. (1935). https://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/ssact/ssact-toc.htm

Universidad de Puerto Rico, Recinto de Río Piedras. (2025, 25 de febrero). Programa de capacitación en trabajo social comienza a rendir frutos entre estudiantes universitarios. https://www.uprrp.edu/programa-de-capacitacion-en-trabajo-social-comienza-a-rendir-frutos-entre-estudiantes-universitarios/

Universidad de Puerto Rico. (2025, 23 de junio). Recinto de Río Piedras de la UPR gradúa 26 trabajadores sociales que se integran al Departamento de la Familia. https://www.upr.edu/recinto-de-rio-piedras-de-la-upr-gradua-26-trabajadores-sociales-que-se-integran-al-departamento-de-la-familia/

University of California Davis Human Services. (2021). CalSWEC Evaluation Report. https://humanservices.ucdavis.edu

United States Census Bureau. (2023). QuickFacts: Puerto Rico. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/PR

U.S. Customs and Border Protection. (s. f.). The Jones Act (Merchant Marine Act of 1920). https://www.cbp.gov

U.S. Department of State, Office of the Historian. (s. f.). Treaty of Paris, 1898. https://history.state.gov

Zlotnik, J. L., DePanfilis, D., Daining, C., & Lane, M. A. (2005). Factors influencing the retention of child welfare staff: A systematic review of the research. Institute for the Advancement of Social Work Research.

Zlotnik, J. L., & Pryce, J. G. (2013). The evolution of federal child welfare training policy. Social Work, 58(3), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swt021