The formal professionalization of social work within the five post-Soviet republics of Central Asia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, represents a complex, contemporary narrative of institutional transition. Each state navigates a distinct evolutionary trajectory. While early legislative and academic recognition began to surface during the 1990s and 2000s in four of the republics, Turkmenistan initiated this fundamental systemic shift only as recently as 2020. Unlike in Western contexts where social work practice has matured for more than a century, Central Asian nations are actively constructing their professional infrastructure from the ground up. Today, an alliance of local academics, state ministries, and transnational stakeholders is driving structural reforms to anchor social work as a vital pillar of modern social welfare.
To understand the contemporary landscape of the region, one must analyze the dual historical legacies that preceded it. In the pre-Soviet period, social support throughout the predominantly Muslim communities of Central Asia was deeply embedded within informal family networks and localized community structures (Urinboyev, 2014). These organic safety nets operated through enduring Islamic institutional traditions, primarily waqf, which are charitable endowments, and zakat, the systemic practice of almsgiving to alleviate poverty (McChesney, 1991). While these indigenous mechanisms offered profound community solidarity, they existed entirely outside formal state systems. The Soviet state shifted to centralized social welfare provision, through state social security structures (SOBES) and heavily relied on institutionalization (Kiik & Sirotkina, 2005). The communist welfare framework prioritized standardized material distribution, ensuring universal access to housing, employment, healthcare, and primary education, devaluing civil, political, and participatory rights (Holt Ruffin, 1999). Thus the approach to care within the state mechanisms leaned toward punitive or institutional isolation rather than therapeutic, rehabilitative care. This systemic reliance on institutionalization created a structural legacy that continued to dominate welfare perspectives long after national independence (Cook & Iarskaia-Smirnova, 2023). Most importantly, the Soviet apparatus did not recognize a distinct professional identity for social workers. Personnel employed by the state welfare institutions were typically administrative clerks, educators, or psychologists lacking specialized social work training (Kiik & Sirotkina, 2005). Their duties were strictly confined to processing state disbursements or providing basic, functional domestic assistance to older adults and individuals with physical disabilities, which has impacted understanding of social work since.
The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 abruptly collapsed this state-guaranteed safety net. Having occupied a peripheral, economically dependent position within the broader Soviet industrial complex, the Central Asian republics faced immediate economic and social vulnerability. The ensuing economic shock differentiated the region along geopolitical and resource lines. The resource-rich states of Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan leveraged oil and gas reserves, while Uzbekistan utilized its gas and mineral wealth to partially insulate their public sectors. The resource-constrained states of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan bore the unmitigated brunt of the economic collapse. Tajikistan’s transition was further devastated by a brutal five-year civil war spanning from 1992 to 1997. As mass unemployment and systemic poverty increased, structural adjustment programs mandated by international financial institutions forced aggressive cuts to public social spending (Becker et al., 2009). In this vacuum of state care, civil society organizations and transnational aid agencies emerged as the primary actors funding localized social services and advocating for early policy interventions (An, 2014).
The Role of Transnational Actors in Professionalization of Social Work
The contemporary architecture of Central Asian social work education owes its inception to targeted transnational investments. Two primary international entities catalyzed this professionalization: the Open Society Foundations (OSF) (Greene, 2013) and UNICEF (An, 2017; Huseinli, 2023) Between 1999 to 2012, the OSF Social Work Fellowship Program systematically selected promising scholars from across the region, sponsoring their advanced Master of Social Work degrees at American institutions (Greene, 2013). This initiative sought to bridge the gap between the inherited Soviet welfare system and the existing global best practices.
Upon returning, these foreign-trained professionals contributed to the effort of developing the discipline. They established the region’s first professional associations, drafted initial university curricula, and initiated empirical social research within their home countries (Greene, 2013).
Concurrently, UNICEF approached professionalization through the lens of child protection and systemic deinstitutionalization. Seeking to replace large-scale, isolated residential institutions with community-based, family-focused support systems, UNICEF deployed international technical experts to build state capacity and advise on legislative reform. This strategic partnership yielded significant dividends in Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan, resulting in the codification of early national practice standards and child welfare protocols (UNICEF, 2022, Ganieva & Kim, 2011). Other international non-governmental organizations, notably Caritas in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, alongside SOS Children's Villages have also been instrumental capacity building among local frontline practitioners.
The evolution of professional infrastructure across the five republics reveals a fragmented timeline, reflecting variations in state capacity and political will. A key structural hurdle stems from institutional genealogy: because initial academic programs were absorbed into existing sociology or psychology departments, they were predominantly staffed by faculty trained in history, philosophy, and the humanities. Social work education was thus weighted toward abstract theory, leaving students unequipped with clinical skills for practice (Expert interviews, 2026).
The current era marks a shift toward practice-oriented, competency-based education, influenced by global frameworks such as the Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards, and supported by academic and UNICEF initiatives and states' growing willingness to institutionalize the profession through stronger curricula, practicum placements, job creation, and policy reform. In Uzbekistan, the National University of Uzbekistan, UNICEF drives this modernization, and the Collaborative Center for Advancing Community Strengths and Social Wellbeing, launched in 2024 with the Columbia University School of Social Work to embed evidence-based interventions into the national curriculum. In Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Turkmenistan, UNICEF country offices and government ministries have supported curriculum redesign and retraining of practicing social workers. Turkmenistan, despite a later start, has drawn on regional best practices—establishing a BSW program in 2023, training its first cohort of social workers, and lobbying for policy change (Expert interviews, 2026).
Another area of development is the need to improve the capacity of the professional associations positioned to design educational and practice standards. While these bodies maintain a visible presence in Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, and Tajikistan, they operate within strict boundaries: none holds a statutory mandate over licensing or certification, as these functions remain centralized within state labor ministries, confining associations to advocacy and non-formal continuing education.
Structural Gaps and Opportunities for Growth
State-level Investment. The uneven nature of professionalization underscores the reality that systemic transformation occurs only when governments reduce reliance on donor financing and invest in institutionalizing the workforce.
Uzbekistan is the region's clearest example of state-driven reform. Following a national needs analysis, the state established the National Agency for Social Protection in 2023, moving social work from the margins of civil society into the center of state administration. It embedded a professional social worker in every community nationwide and created 208 district-based Inson Centers, staffed by chief social workers, clinical supervisors, and multidisciplinary teams. To scale this workforce to roughly 10,000 positions, the state initially recruited from allied disciplines, such as pedagogy, psychology, history, placing them on interim tracks supported by large-scale retraining.
Other countries illustrate the profession's precarity when compensation stagnates. Kyrgyzstan has seen a multi-year, up to fivefold drop in university social work enrollment, as prospective students opt for psychology's higher pay and prestige instead. A recent presidential decree tripled salary scales for family-centric social workers and funded 550 new positions.
This under-compensation also drives brain drain: many scholars who earned advanced degrees abroad through prestigious fellowships found state academic salaries unlivable upon return, and most left higher education for better-funded international NGOs (Expert interviews, 2026). This leaves domestic universities without the specialized expertise needed to mentor future educators. Still, new developments still regularly occur, such as the founding of Kazakhstan's first doctoral programs in social work.
Supervision Deficit is one of the consistent gaps named across all countries: interviewees described a lack of formalized system of trained field supervisors. Both education and field supervision of ongoing professional practice was reportedly lacking in all of the countries, while efforts are being made in Uzbekistan to start filling this gap. This absence persists despite a widely acknowledged risk of burnout among practitioners who are regularly exposed to difficult cases without structured support. Countries that are already expanding placement partnerships (Kyrgyzstan) or shifting curricula toward practice (Kazakhstan) have laid groundwork that could be extended into a genuine supervision infrastructure that will further improve the practice and reduce turnover.
Resolving Legal Identity of the Profession. The clearest regional gap is the absence of a standalone law defining the social work profession and its scope of practice. Kazakhstan's 2023 Social Code includes a chapter on social workers' status, rights, ethics, and guarantees, yet its experts cite an unresolved classification dispute: social work is designated a "service" rather than an academic discipline, affecting research-grant eligibility and fueling disputes over whether Labor and Social Protection or Education and Science should govern social work education. Kyrgyzstan is pursuing a UNICEF-supported revision of the Regulation on the Social Worker (Postanovlenie #157, 2012) and the occupational classification, currently closer to technical staff than certified profession, limiting certification and pay. Turkmenistan regulates the field through its 2021 Law on Social Services and implementing by-laws, while Tajikistan's framework — a Law on Social Services and the occupational classification — remains the least developed, with no comparable reform effort reported. Uzbekistan has moved furthest: its law on social work, enacted in July 2026, defines the status of the profession and provides a unified framework for social work and social services. Notably, Uzbekistan's system reform described above advanced through executive prioritization before the law reached parliament — showing professionalization in practice can precede formal recognition, with law consolidating rather than initiating it. The region thus displays complementary pathways: codification within welfare legislation, a dedicated professional law, and administrative reform ahead of legislation.
Opportunities for Professional Growth in the Region
This review highlights the many opportunities for growth of the social work profession in the region. Moving away from the historic, vertical dependence on Western donor organizations, Central Asian academic institutions are actively forging localized and regional networks to share indigenous knowledge and culturally syntonic practice and policy models. While still dependent on external funding for building education and research capacity, Central Asian social work leaders in academia and field are relying more on neighboring country experiences rather than outside expertise. Turkmenistan and Tajikistan, the two countries in early stages of social work professionalization are actively seeking shared regional expertise to inform the process of policy and practice design. Collaborative spaces have been created by the Associations of Schools of Social Work in each of the countries (except for Turkmenistan where it does not yet exist), where exchange of expertise and learning happens. Kazakhstan cites an active three-year consortium involving Hong Kong University, KazNU, Eurasian University, Narxoz University, and IASSW. Kyrgyzstan describes ongoing partnerships with Kazakh and Uzbek counterparts and an unfinished application to join IASSW as an institutional member. Uzbekistan and Tajikistan both point to the EU-funded Erasmus+ project connecting Central Asian universities as a working model of the cooperation they hope to expand. By transitioning from passive recipients of international aid to active co-creators of their own professional future, Central Asian educators and policy makers are gradually codifying a distinct model of social work practice calibrated to the unique socio-cultural realities of the communities it serves.
Acknowledgements:
Authors of this article are grateful for the knowledge and expertise readily shared for this article by the academic and professional social work communities of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.
References
An, S. (2014). Social work between "Westernization" and "nationalization": The transnational
perspective on social work in post-socialist/post-Soviet states. In C. Bahr, H. G., Homfeld, C. Schröder, W. Schroer, C. Schweppe (eds.), The World Atlas of Social Work. Weinheim/München: BELTZ Juventa.
An, S. (2017) ‘Social work of boundaries’: emerging multiple social
work fields in post-Soviet Eurasia, European Journal of Social Work, 20:6, 894-906, DOI:
10.1080/13691457.2017.1320532
Becker, C., Marchenko, G., Khakimzhanov, S., Seitkali, R., & Thießen, U. (2009). Social security reform in transition economies: Lessons from Kazakhstan. Springer.
Cook, L. J., & Iarskaia-Smirnova, E. (2023). Welfare Reforms in Post-Soviet States: Current Issues and Research Highlights. Europe-Asia Studies, 75(2), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2023.2168875
Expert Interviews (2026). Focus group discussions with social work faculty and practitioners of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. June, 22-26
Ganieva, M., & Kim, L. (2011). The development of social work in Uzbekistan: characteristics, challenges & successes. In Social work education in countries of the east: Issues and challenges (pp. 579-598).
Greene, L. (2013). Fellows Help Social Work Bloom in Central Asia. Voices. Open Society Foundation. https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/und-15
Huseynli, A. (2023) Social Work Education in Post-Soviet Countries: Progress of Azerbaijan. The British Journal of Social Work, 53 (5). https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcac225
Kiik, R. & Sirotkina, R. (2005). The Development of Social Work as a Specialty in Estonia. Social Work & Society,3 (1). http://www.socwork.net/KiikSirotkina2005.pdf
McChesney, R. D. (1991). Waqf in Central Asia: Four hundred years in the history of a Muslim shrine, 1480–1889. Princeton University Press.
Postanovlenie Pravitelstva Kyrgyzskoi Respubliki # 157 “Ob utverzhdenii polozhenia o social’nom rabotnike (2012, February, 29). https://continent-online.com/Document/?doc_id=31136865#pos=0;58
Urinboyev. 2014. “Is there an Islamic Public Administration Legacy in Post-Soviet Central Asia.An Ethnographic Study of Everyday Mahalla Life in Rural Ferghana, Uzbekistan.” Administrative Culture 15(2), 157-178.
UNICEF Europe and Central Asia. (2022). Keeping families together in Central Asia. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/eca/reports/keeping-families-together-central-asia